Amazon UK

Showing posts with label The Huffington Post | The Full Feed. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Huffington Post | The Full Feed. Show all posts

Monday, 23 October 2017

Women MPs Reveal Sex Assaults To Help Victims Speak Up After Harvey Weinstein Scandal


Women MPs have revealed shocking accounts of being subject to sexual assaults and harassment as they aim to encourage victims of abuse to speak out.


Labour’s Mary Creagh said she was sexually assaulted by about 12 boys during a school playground game of kiss-chase.


Jess Phillips told how she had been left “paralysed by fear” when she woke up at a party to find her boss undoing her belt and trying to get into her trousers.


Conservative Theresa Villiers said she had to “fend off some groping hands” during the early days of her political career.


Phillips said she was speaking out for the sake of the women who “don’t have power to”.


She told the London Evening Standard: “I was working in a bar and I remember going to a party and we went back to someone’s house and my boss was there.


“I had fallen asleep on the sofa and when I woke up he was undoing my belt and trying to get into my trousers. I was absolutely paralysed with fear. He was loads older than me - maybe 25 years older.


“Someone else came in the room and dragged him off me. Then I went back to work the next day ... it’s hard to comprehend that these things are happening until after the event.


“For most women you can look back and say ‘I wish I had told the police’, but knowing what I know in working in sexual violence services I doubt they would have been able to do something.”






Phillips also described an attack in a bar in France while visiting a friend.


She said: “I was 19 or 20 and a young group of lads were talking to us and flirting with us. We all had boyfriends and we said we weren’t interested in them and then one of them grabbed me and put me up against a wall and felt my vagina.


“I spat in his face and I slapped him. I was older then and I’m a relatively vocal human being anyway and I was thrown out of the bar.


“When we left that group just laughed at us. That was proper sexual assault.”


Creagh said she was just seven when she was attacked by a group of older boys.


She told the newspaper: “I had my underwear torn off during a game of kiss chase and was sexually assaulted by about 12 boys. They were older than me, about ten or 11 years old.”


Creagh also told how when she was 16 her parish priest pinched her bottom, and she revealed that a teacher who had given her a lift drove to his house and turned off the lights before trying to kiss her.


Villiers, a former Northern Ireland Secretary, said: “I recall one instance in the late 90s when I was a candidate for the European elections and attended a Conservative function.


“As I was leaving at the end of the evening after having made my speech, I had to fend off some groping hands from one of the event organisers.”






-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post UK, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2gwYEvt
via IFTTT

Kay Burley Refused To Let US General Jack Keane Dictate Their Interview Over Trump's Latest Row





The latest controversy engulfing the Donald Trump White House has seen the US President challenge the account of the widow of a US soldier who was killed in Niger.


Myeshia Johnson told ABC’s ‘Good Morning America’ on Monday that she was “hurt” when Trump told her in a phone call last week that her husband, Sgt La David Johnson, “knew what he signed up for”.


“He couldn’t remember my husband’s name,” she added, referring to the presidential call that has ignited a week-long controversy. “I heard him stumbling on trying to remember my husband’s name.”


Her account was, however, challenged by Trump himself, who said he spoke “without hesitation”. 






Why the US President would pick holes in the account of a grieving war widow has baffled many around the world, and the wisdom of Trump’s actions was probed on Sky News in the UK - sparking a flashpoint live on TV.


Presenter Kay Burley, known for her robust interview style, was interviewing retired four-star general, General Jack Keane, about the President’s call.


The former Vice Chief of Staff of the US Army, a regular commentator on Fox News in the US, largely defended Trump against many of his critics but was “certainly not going to challenge anything that a soldier’s wife has to say under these circumstances and the grief that she is dealing with”. 


“I respect who she is and I suffer for her loss,” he added, before Burley asked why he thought the President didn’t adopt a similar approach. This exchange followed:



Burley: “Why didn’t the President say that I wonder?”


Keane: “Can we stop this conversation and go on with something else.”


Burley: “No, no. We want to know exactly what you think about this, sir. Why would the president not have said...”


Keane: “I have already gave you my answer. I’m done with the conversation. I’m done with the conversation. Make up your mind.”


Burley: “So you are going to walk out if we continue to talk about his conversation? Is that what you are saying?”


Keane: “I think I have answered your question.”


Burley: “You have not. I’m asking you a follow-up question. You said you would never say that, you would never challenge a war widow. I’m saying to you that your president did. Is that acceptable?”


(Pause)


Keane: ” have given you my answer.”


Burley: “No you didn’t. That’s why I’m asking you the question, sir.”


Keane: “I’m giving you my answer.”


Burley: “What is your answer?”


Keane: “I just gave it to you before.”


Burley:  “Remind me, please.”


(Long pause)


Burley: “Remind me please, if you would, sir.”


(Long pause)


Burley: “Do you appreciate how offensive this must be to war widows? Not just of the one that we have been talking about, but more generally when someone in your position feels that it is inappropriate to answer these sort of questions?”


Keane: “I have given you an explanation of my feeling on this subject. And I have also told you I think this subject is one that the more we spend time on it the more difficult it is for all the parties concerned. That was one of the things I thought General Kelly did so eloquently in providing us with the missive ... is there anything that is left sacred in this country that we have to be involved in the middle of a situation like this with a grieving family? That is what I resent. I have answered your questions and I’m not answering any more on this subject.”


Burley: “OK, would you like to talk about North Korea instead?”


Keane: “It is up to you.”


Burley: “It is not because you won’t answer my questions.”







Viewers were largely on Burley’s side, including journalist Piers Morgan - who had a stint as a broadcaster in the US. 














Though not everyone was on the same page.






type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=MORE KAY BURLEY + articlesList=58f78ec0e4b0de5bac4316aa,58bdb801e4b0d8c45f45605a,58dbd44ce4b0546370641f0c

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post UK, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2y1E9xe
via IFTTT

Ken Clarke Urges Theresa May To Team Up With Labour To Defeat 'No Deal' Tories


Theresa May was urged to form a Brexit coalition with Labour today in order to drown out the ‘no deal’ voices in her Cabinet.


Tory veteran Ken Clarke – a stalwart of Margaret Thatcher’s government – called for cross-party working in order the get the Brexit negotiations back on track.


The pro-EU MP – who stood for the Tory leadership three times – challenged the Prime Minister to appoint a “trusted minister” to liaise with opposition to help present a stronger negotiating position to Brussels.


Backbench Tories such as Owen Paterson and John Redwood are growing increasingly bullish about leaving the EU without a trade deal, and Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson has set out ‘red lines’ on any package which are stronger than the Prime Minister’s stated position.


Clarke’s question came moments after Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn mocked May for her ‘Groundhog Day’ statement on the Brexit talks, saying MPs are no nearer knowing when trade talks will begin.


The three-time leadership candidate suggested one of the reasons for the sluggish progress was due to the splits at the very top of his own party.


He said: “Other EU leaders can see that a noisy minority in the Cabinet and on the backbenches of her own party have persuaded themselves that no deal at all is completely desirable.


“This causes them to doubt if she is able to produce a clear picture of where she eventually wants to go and whether she’s able to produce a majority here for any agreement they have with her.


“Has she considered, she may have done already, appointing some trusted minister to make approaches to leading members of the opposition parties to see if they will live up to some of the things that the leader appears to say and perhaps do better, so at least we can have consensus in this parliament in the national interest on the outline of a transitional deal at least, that would enable us then to negotiate the final details of an arrangement that majority of this House could agree?”


May quipped that Clarke’s question “sounded rather like a job application”, before claiming her Florence speech did bring “clarity” to the UK’s Brexit position.


In her statement to Parliament, May told MPs that the EU27’s agreement last week to prepare for trade talks would not have happened without the “new momentum” given by her address in the historic Italian city in September.






Corbyn mocked her claim of progress, reminding her she used the same language when she appeared before MPs on October 9.


The Labour leader said: “I’m now beginning to get a very worrying sense of Groundhog Day here every time she gives us an update on the progress on negotiations.


“Only two weeks ago she told this House that her speech in Florence had put momentum into the Article 50 negotiations and that an agreement on phase one of these talks was within touching distance.


“Well, here we are again after another round of talks and we are still no clearer as to when negotiations on Britain’s future with our largest trading partner will actually begin and no clearer as to what she’s agreed to in phase one of these talks.”


May said while no final Brexit had been reached “it was going to happen.”


She said: “I’d have a degree of confidence that we’ll be able to get to the point of sufficient progress by December.”


The Prime Minister claimed the leaders of Germany, Ireland, Sweden, Italy. Poland and Denmark all recognised the “new momentum” caused by the Florence speech.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post UK, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2xZi7jq
via IFTTT

Halima Aden Made Her Mark At London's First Modest Fashion Festival

Halima Aden was the star of the UK’s first Modest Fashion Festival, which turned a spotlight onto luxury fashion that caters to women who prefer to dress modestly, for cultural or religious reasons. 


Aden, who made headlines earlier this year for her Vogue Arabia and Allure magazine covers, said the fashion on show at London’s Grosvenor House hotel on 21 October, would fill a major gap in the market.


She often finds it difficult to find modest outfits to wear to events which require her to find something a little more luxurious.


“For the first time, modest fashion is going from high street to luxury, because we want luxury too,” she told HuffPost UK. 


“Finding something luxurious that also fits my definition of modesty is very difficult. So it’s nice that designers are starting to cater to that.”



 


Human rights barrister and event organiser Sultana Tafadar told HuffPost UK that modest fashion should cater to women who are interested in attire at the luxury end of the scale. 


“There’s a growing middle class of Muslim professional women who have the disposable income to wear luxury ready-to-wear and couture outfits. 


But designers at the moment aren’t catering to the modest dresser at the luxury end of the market- except for the odd one or two pieces in a collection that may be suitable.” 


With sponsors like Charlotte Tilbury and Bentley, it is clear that luxury brands believe there is money to be made from the modest fashion market.



The modest fashion aesthetic has exploded on the international fashion scene, but is a modest style of dress significant for women who come from diverse backgrounds? 


Tafadar seems to think so: “Modest fashion has really taken on its own life, especially with social influencers.


“The message we want to get across from this event is that modest fashion isn’t just exclusive to people who wear hijab.


“It kind of transcends all races, religions and boundaries. We hope modest fashion will evolve into every sphere: from sportswear, to casual, to luxury.”



One of the designers of the night, Raishma Islam, took a minute to discuss her view on modest fashion with HuffPost UK.


Interestingly, her eponymous brand had not taken part in a modest show before. A Raishma collection typically features garments ranging from mainstream styles to more covered-up attire suitable for modest dressers.


“The UK is so mixed and diverse now,” said the designer. “I feel like if Muslim women want to dress modestly then that should be accepted.


“A lot of the high-street stores have caught up to that idea and you’ve got the big, couture designers doing it as well. 


“Even our own collection, (soon to launch in Debenhams in the Middle East), has a mixture of modest and not so modest clothing and I think that represents the customer now - a mixture of tastes.” 



There are certain elements of modest wear that fit really well for anybody. It may not be for everybody to choose every single piece, but they may choose one or two elements and wear it their own way.
Raishma Islam


Islam further pointed out the universal potential of modest attire. 


“There are some really beautiful pieces with long sleeves and lengths and loose fits,” she said.


“I mean look at the cape style, for example. It’s a trend that’s run through from high-street to couture. You’re fairly covered up.” 



Throughout the night, there was a strong emphasis on modest tastes being relevant to UK women who are not only Muslim-observant, but may simply wish to try something for its stand-alone beauty and elegance. 


There is a spectrum on the definition of modest dress, too. With traditional garments coming from Indonesian designers like Zubedi being almost entirely covered up.  


Whereas others, like UK-based Raishma, allowed for a bit of skin on show and hinted at the female form under the fabric. 


“It’s important to know that modesty is an individual’s personal preference and it differs from girl to girl,” Aden explained.


“There is no right or wrong.”



One of the night’s biggest take aways was the fact that it’s every woman’s choice whether or not she wants to dress modestly -  depending on her outlook, sartorial taste and the time of year.


Take a look at some of the images from the memorable event. 












type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=SEE ALSO + articlesList=59be6318e4b02da0e14295cf,58aad7ffe4b037d17d29711b,59312113e4b02478cb9a37be




-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post UK, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2yIcAuJ
via IFTTT

These Self-Charging Car Batteries Could Revolutionise The Electric Car






Self-charging batteries in electrics cars could become an actual thing in the future. 


According to researchers at Warwick University’s Energy and Innovations Centre, the answer could lie in what’s known as fuel cells.


“What we would envisage in the future is a combination of an electric vehicle with its electric battery combined with a fuel cell acting as what you would call a range extender so you’ve got an electric vehicle that produces no emissions, when the battery gets a little bit depleted the fuel cell will then recharge the battery,” said Mark Amor-Segan principal research engineer, Energy and Innovations Centre, University of Warwick. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post UK, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2yLl0U5
via IFTTT

Universal Credit Has To Work For The Self Employed

Today marks the year anniversary of my first election as the Member of Parliament for Batley and Spen.

During the year, one of the most pressing and continuous issues has been confusion and mistakes around the benefits system. With the Universal Credit rollout now started, things will only get worse.

500,000 new claims are being added every month and in Batley and Spen 900 people are expected to be moved over to Universal Credit on November 1st.

With Citizens Advice Bureaus and Job Centres closing, my constituents are coming to my surgery for help in ever greater numbers. I have personally made more referrals for working families to our local food banks in the last few month than ever before.

Our poor, both in work and not, are getting poorer and in increasingly difficult situations. Using Peter to pay Paul families are ending up in serious difficulties and deeper in debt.

Numbers attending the homeless drop in centre in Batley has doubled and local food-banks are bracing themselves for an onslaught of misery before Christmas.

My constituents are being treated as guinea pigs in the system roll out.

For most of my working life before entering parliament, I was self-employed, either in acting or writing. And I feel for them now as freelancers and self-employed are being targeted by Universal Credit.

I'm well aware of the vagaries of the freelance life. One month you're paid, three months you struggle by on nothing. At a time when the UK creative industries is worth four times more to the British economy than the automotive industry, it's galling to know that the average income for a writer is £10,000 a year and not much more for actors.

This means, inevitably, a large majority of creatives and plenty of others will need to use the benefit system to get them through the difficult, lean times.

Now, most entertainers are self-employed. It's been established in case law and accepted by HMRC that entertainers should usually be classed as self-employed for tax purposes as the manner in which the work is characteristically freelance. For example, work is short term, offered at short notice, entertainers have to do unpaid preparatory work, they're sole traders and responsible for their own expenses.

Moving from traditional benefits on to Universal Credit means those 'gainfully self-employed' now will have their average earnings as a baseline, the 'Minimum Income Floor'. This is set at 35x the National Minimum Wage per week.

On average that means HMRC will assume you earn over the year £1,047.50 a month regardless if you earn it or not.

Looking at the figures this means someone who's self-employed and on Universal Credit will be far worse off than if they were on legacy benefits and even more impoverished than if they were a regular unemployed Universal Credit claimant.

As Universal Credit payments include housing costs, the self-employed and freelancers will be increasingly unable to pay rent, risking homelessness.

Unlike many other UC claimants, entertainers don't have a choice as to whether they pursue self-employment. They must be registered as self-employed in order to work professionally.

If an entertainer claiming UC is deemed gainfully self-employed then they're penalised by the Minimum Income Floor yet if they're not deemed to be self-employed they are mandated to be looking for work in a PAYE job.

This is a terrible Catch 22 position to be in and gives the entertainer no choice but to leave the career they trained for.

If you're self-employed or low paid, you'll receive less benefit and there was nothing in the original policy intent that said self-employment should be penalised.

The minimum income floor is the equivalent of a 35-hour working week on the minimum wage, we know not everybody can get that kind of level of employment from self-employment in today's world of insecure work.

I'd be surprised if legal minds weren't looking at the impact of Universal Credit on the self-employed.

In April 2017 the Work and Pensions Committee called for the solving of problems in the practical operation of UC to become an 'urgent priority'.

The Government later released the 'Self Employment and The Gig Economy' research document which included a recommendation that the Minimum Income Floor assumption is suspended while an independent review is carried out on UC and self-employment in order to 'improve its sensitivities to realities of self-employment. Until this is complete, the Minimum Income Floor should not apply to self-employed UC claimants'.

Sadly there seems to be no indication from DWP that they've listened to these recommendations or that they are investigating the unfair impact the roll out of UC on the self-employed will have.

Earlier this year I, along with Gloria De Piero MP, chaired an enquiry into the class ceiling in the cultural industries. The subsequent report - Acting Up - showed unequivocally that carving out a proper career in the arts is becoming increasingly difficult for working class creatives.

With Universal Credit unfairly discriminating against creatives, it is inevitable there will be a diminishing of the diversity in the industry and it will only be those with private means or wealthy parents who can aspire to a career as a creative freelancer.

Our country will be all the worse for it and Labour will be campaigning to keep working class voices at the heart of the cultural industries.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post UK, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2gCRWaX
via IFTTT

Stephen Hawking's 'Historic And Compelling' 1966 PhD Thesis Available For The First Time






Professor Stephen Hawking has made his PhD thesis “Properties of expanding universes” freely available online for the first time ever.


Written in 1966 by a then 24-year-old Hawking, the “historic and compelling” thesis asks vital questions about the expansion of the universe.



“Properties of expanding universes” has consistently been the most requested document within the University’s collection.


Commenting on why he agreed to have this thesis published, Professor Hawking said: “By making my PhD thesis Open Access, I hope to inspire people around the world to look up at the stars and not down at their feet; to wonder about our place in the universe and to try and make sense of the cosmos.”


“Anyone, anywhere in the world should have free, unhindered access to not just my research, but to the research of every great and enquiring mind across the spectrum of human understanding.”


The university now hopes that many of its other well-known academics will follow in Professor Hawking’s example and will make their doctoral theses available.


To ensure that this sharing of information can continue in the future, all PhD students from October onwards will be required to give an electronic version of their thesis for preservation. They will then be allowed to decide if the piece is simply kept in storage or published online through Open Access repository Apollo. 


type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related... + articlesList=59981ecde4b01f6e801ee228,595a1f7de4b05c37bb7f666d,58cf8fb0e4b0be71dcf5b8ed

Dr Arthur Smith, Deputy Head of Scholarly Communication said: “It is especially important for disseminating the knowledge acquired during doctoral research studies. PhD theses contain a vast trove of untapped and unique information just waiting to be used, but which is often locked away from view and scrutiny.”


According to the university, Apollo is home to over 200,000 digital objects including 15,000 research articles.


Professor Hawking’s “A Brief History of Time” is arguably one of the best-selling popular science books ever, having sold over 10m copies.


If, however, you would like to go back to where it all began you can download and read Professor Hawking’s thesis right here.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post UK, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2yBVYY5
via IFTTT

Parents Reminded To Seek Medical Advice Before Feeding Their Baby Vegan Diet

Parish, Town And Community Councils Should Be Central To Localism

Following the recent annual conference of the National Association of Local Councils, and subsequent reporting in the media and on social media, I have been rightly reminded of the important (if not critical) contribution to our democratic life and well-being that parish, town and community councils can make.

Across the country, these councils and their councillors and staff (where they employ staff) are speaking up for their communities, challenging principal local authorities, providing services and supporting local people. All too often, they are plugging key gaps in service provisions as public services are being severely cut by the principal local authorities, the police, the NHS and other public sector bodies. Some are acting as the agents for others, whilst many are simply doing what is right for their local communities. Some have been granted devolved powers and resources by principal councils.

I served as a town councillor many decades ago, and when I was a county councillor, I worked in partnership with the local town and parish councils. I recognised them as being close to and, effectively, an important though not exclusive 'voice' of their communities. I believed strongly then, and looking back, I still do, that working in partnership in this way enabled me to be a more effective community county councillor. I know that many of my colleagues felt the same - and that many elected members of principal local authorities still feel the same today.

Recent legislation has enhanced the powers and potential for local councils. I am thinking, in particular, of the general power of well-being and the introduction of neighbourhood plans. Local councils have a power to raise taxation through a precept on the council tax, and many use this power to great effect to secure public benefit. They often will adopt a 'just get on do' attitude especially to address small issues which matter to local communities.

I have experienced some very imaginative and innovative activities and interventions by local councils. They are smaller and less burdened with statutory duties than principal councils, and so they are able to experiment more easily and be more responsive to local need and aspirations. However, because of their size, they are commonly constrained by their resource base, their human capacity (though many councillors will roll their sleeves up and mobilise volunteers in ways that would not be as practical or appropriate for a principal authority) and their legal powers. Too often, in my experience, they can also be constrained by the actions or inactions of principal councils and other public sector bodies. When this happens, it is very unfortunate.

Of course, not all local councils are as effective as they could be. Some (perhaps too many) have memberships which are not as representative of the community as they desirably should be (although this critique applies just as equally to principal local authorities, and even to Parliament). In my opinion, local town, parish and community councils are invariably stronger when councillors are elected through a competitive ballot. This enhances the democratic legitimacy of the members and their council. That said, we should not assume that those who stand and are elected unopposed are any less important or legitimate. After all, they are not (well, not usually, at least) responsible for the paucity of candidates.

I should also make it clear that I see no reason why party politics should not play a role in local councils. Rather, the focus of members although councils should always be first and foremost on place and communities.

When candidates seek election a party rosette enables the electorate to have a better idea of their values and approach Of course, many candidates will seek election on specific local issues. What matters is for candidates to be open and transparent about their party and other allegiances.

It is to be regretted that not all England benefits from local councils. They are more likely to be found in rural areas although it is encouraging that there has been some growth in parish and community councils in urban and city council areas. And I most certainly have no hesitation in urging all principal local authorities to explore the development of parish, town and community councils as their default position - and not as the exception. Of course, this is about localism so what is required should be locally decided.

When I hear of principal local authority leaders, members or officers opposing or making the creation of local councils difficult, I despair. In particular, I wonder whatever happened to the idea of 'double devolution'.

As local authorities move to merge and look upwards, surely more and stronger local councils can ensure that local voice and representation is both strong and provides a community or neighbourhood focus.

Of course, local councils are not the only voices within any community or neighbourhood. And whilst they are clearly the ones with a democratic mandate and legitimacy, they can still gain much from working closely with and supporting local community voluntary sector groups (VCS) and social activists. And they should also work with local businesses and the wider public sector.

Principal local authorities should foster, facilitate and encourage a range of participatory and representative bodies and arrangements to enhance local democracy. They must build positive relationships across the spectrum of bodies and such arrangements.

Of all these important relationships, the local council-VCS one is fundamental to local social well-being. It should be fostered and it should be built on mutual respect. There will be opportunities to act in partnership, to stand aside to allow one partner to act, to share and pool resources, and to provide mutual support, and crucially, to find common voice to other public bodies on behalf of the community.

Local councils and councillors should be both willing and ready for the VCS to challenge and to criticise. I am in no doubt that by listening and then responding appropriately, a council can dramatically strengthen its impact. Of course, many VCS activists may themselves by local councillors in their parish, town and community council - such is the rich tapestry of a local place.

I urge all parties to rethink their roles, relationships and act in the interests of local communities. Consequently I urge local councils and local VCS organisations to commit to greater partnership and where appropriate pursue shared agendas.

I urge the VCS to support local campaigns and initiatives to establish local councils in areas where they do not currently exist.

I urge the VCS to challenge those local councils, which are underperforming or which are not being responsive to local needs, local concerns and/or all local people. Complacent and inward-looking, self-serving groups must always be challenged and disrupted, should these ever appear on any council. I urge parish, town and community councils to support local VCS financially and 'in kind', and/or though pooling of defined resources, to establish ways to involve the VCS in decision making, to engage the VCS in local planning and strategic visioning, and to enlist the VCS when seeking to persuade principal local authorities and others.

I urge central government to promote and encourage the extension of parish, town and community council coverage. I also urge government to extend the powers of local councils and introduce guidance to ensure that its voice is required to be addressed in a meaningful way by principal local authorities and other public bodies on key policy, service commissioning and delivery, planning and budgeting decisions.

I urge all principal local authorities to explore with local communities and others, how and where to establish new local councils. I also urge them to demonstrate a respect and partnership with local councils. In particular, they should establish means by which local councils can be both heard and help to shape policy decisions, and thus enhancing their community leadership and place shaping roles.

Principal local authorities should involve local councils in the design and delivery of services in partnership or through agency arrangements. They should be be willing to devolve decision making and resources to local councils where this will lead to greater effectiveness and responsiveness and is both politically and economically viable.

Principal council councillors should be encouraged and supported to collaborate with local councils as a means of strengthening their representative responsibility.

In addition, it would be fantastic to learn that principal councils were appointing cabinet members with a specific brief for local councils, communities, promoting democracy and fostering civil society.

Let me be clear. There must be a greater role for and more parish, town and community councils or else localism will never fulfil its potential

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post UK, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2xZM4uL
via IFTTT

The J Cloth Incident

"Mummy! That lady has got four bums". My brother shouted at a ridiculous volume whilst pointing enthusiastically at a woman, who did indeed have four bums. Her shorts were so tight that her arse looked like a pair of festoon curtains.

We were in Flamingo Land, our favourite place in the whole world. Also known as the place parents take their kids if they are too skint to afford Disneyland. Flamingo Land has it all; a funfair, a zoo and a circus. Everywhere you look there are ice cream vans, parents arguing and kids screaming excitedly as they are flung around on the rides. The one thing we didn't experience were queues. My mum was very smart and did the genius, albeit, illegal thing of taking us off school for a week. It was in the past, things like that were fine then. Flamingo land is in North Yorkshire and people would only go for a day or a weekend. Not us, we'd stay a full week and love it. My favourite bit was choosing our mini box of 'posh' branded cereal each morning. The stuff of dreams. I remember sitting in my pyjamas watching telly the morning the news announced the death of Princess Diana. I was more concerned that my brother had eaten my mini box of chocolate cereal.

We'd go to Flamingo Land every year for a week and the remaining weeks of the year were filled with me bragging and showing off about our holidays to anyone in my presence. I'll be honest with you, I mainly went for a monkey called Albert who lived at the zoo. We'd watch Albert for hours at a time. My poor mum must have been bored stiff. We'd been visiting Albert for years and years and watched him change so much during that time. We'd observed him sniff his mate's bums, seen him get a monkey wife (Victoria) and we even ignored the rumours that it was a different monkey every year. I loved Flamingo Land so much that I made a nine year old family friend cry (I was also nine at the time, I'm not a monster). He'd recently got back from the Canary Islands with stories of his travels. I stared him out for a while before crossing my arms and saying 'Yeah but did you make friends with a monkey?" He had not. He went home and begged his parents to take him to Flamingo Land. They were a posh family, they wouldn't take him.

It was all going great until my little sister and I had a near death experience. We ran towards a helicopter ride, we argued on the way there about who would be the pilot. I'm four years older but she's scary so she won and got to be the five year old pilot. A truly horrifying concept. As a kid she was terrifying. She's a grown woman now and I'm reminded the word to use is 'sassy'. The Flamingo Land staff came round to check all the kids were secured in the rides safely before pressing the start button. They got round to our carriage and realised our safety door was broken. Instead of telling us to go into another helicopter carriage they decided to tie us in using a J cloth. Even as a kid I remember thinking "well, this seems fucking stupid, surely it's a joke" But oh no, it was happening. The ride started up. We went higher and higher. The helicopter carriage turned to one side, my side with the metal door, and then tilted the other way...the J cloth side. Oh shit. Shit indeed. J cloths shouldn't be used to stop kids from dying. My sister and I started screaming for help as we felt the J cloth begin to rip. We looked down at my mum and screamed 'Mummy! Help us!' She couldn't hear us and just smiled and waved. Chilling. I still to this day have no idea how we didn't die. Whenever I'm shopping for grown up things like scented candles or cleaning products and I stumble across J cloths I shudder at the memory, can't bring myself to buy them and would much rather use an old sock to clean my shelves.

I recently went back to Flamingo Land, just for the day. Good news, Albert is still there but for some strange reason people kept calling him Tony.

For more stories go to https://ladyilaria.com

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post UK, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2xZL0Y8
via IFTTT

#PatientsNotPassports Urges Government To Scrap Contentious Health Tourism Policy






A contentious new government policy which requires health care professionals to crack down on so-called “health tourism” has been slammed by medics as an attempt to “scapegoat migrants and fuel xenophobia”.


New rules come into force today which require all providers of treatment on the NHS to establish if patients are eligible for free care.


Foreign visitors who are not eligible may have to pay upfront for any non-urgent or planned care under the regulations introduced by the Department of Health.



Demonstrators gathered outside the Department of Health’s offices in central London on Monday morning to protest the policy, with dozens more joining the #patientsnotpassports social media trend.


Hospitals will be required to identify a patient’s chargeable status so any costs can be recovered, however doctors have warned the rules “lack clarity” and could burden NHS Trusts with extra bureaucracy.


Among the treatments exempt from the charging rules are emergency care and maternity care.


Charging will also not apply when it is not in the interest of public health to do so, such as treating infectious disease.


Meanwhile vulnerable groups of people, such as asylum seekers, will not be charged for treatment.



Dr Jessica Potter is a lung specialist at Queen Mary University London. She opposes the government policy, saying that it is a distraction from the far larger - and expensive - problem of “chronic underfunding” of health services. 


“The NHS is grossly underfunded and people are overworked and this is just a mechanism to scapegoat migrants and fuel xenophobia,” Dr Potter told HuffPost UK.


She warned that the new policy could cause a public health crisis as people will be deterred from seeking help, particularly in the earlier stages of an illness or disease.


“For all diseases the longer you leave a disease untreated the more expensive it becomes to treat and the more likely it will need to be treated in emergency care, which puts pressure on the National Health Service.


″(The NHS) is already overstretched and it being overstretched has absolutely nothing to do with health tourism and everything to do with chronic underfunding and is a political choice by this government.”


She added: “We need to call for the government to retract this ridiculous policy and evaluate it. It’s very unclear whether this will save the NHS any money at all and in fact, it’s most likely to cost not just more money but human lives.”


Dr Potter said that she feels under pressure to sign the forms declaring whether a patient is eligible for treatment because if she does not then she may be accused of fraud.


“I don’t agree with the policy but I’ve also read all of the policy documents and in it there’s a section which suggests that people should report doctors and other people working in the healthcare service for fraud if they attempt to try to treat someone who is ineligible for treatment. It talks about criminal charges and criminal and civil prosecution,” she added.


Campaign group DocsNotCops encouraged supports to post pictures of themselves holding a banner reading “patientsnotpassports” today.


Healthcare professionals from a range of specialisms shared images on social media in protest to the government’s scheme.
















Non healthcare professionals also shared images on social media.


















Health Minister Lord O’Shaughnessy said the NHS was open to foreign visitors so long as they make their “fair financial contribution” towards care costs.


“The new regulations simply require NHS bodies to make enquiries about, and then charge, those who aren’t entitled to free NHS care. All the money raised goes back into funding and improving care for NHS patients,” he said.


“We are clear that some vulnerable groups are exempt from charging and the NHS will never withhold urgent and immediately necessary treatment.”


Dr Chaand Nagpaul, council chair of the British Medical Association, said it was “vital” patients with acute needs, or those from vulnerable groups, do not face bureaucratic or financial obstacles.


To do so would be “morally unacceptable and could end up costing the NHS more money due to lack of timely treatment,” he added.


“It is important that those accessing NHS services are eligible to do so, especially at a time when the NHS is under intense pressure and struggling to cope with patient demand,” he said.


“However, the current charging proposals lack clarity around how and when overseas patients should be charged which does run the risk of causing confusion and an additional administrative burden within NHS Trusts.”


type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related... + articlesList=5833f720e4b0b8f77011dd0a

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post UK, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2zvePkq
via IFTTT

Citizenship Education - Call To Action

Through working for a charity committed to enabling young people to become active citizens, I see first hand the importance of engaging young people in the economic, political and legal worlds. Now more than ever, it is vital that young people are given the knowledge and the skills to confidently navigate these worlds - either to make positive changes, petition and lobby ministers or simply to understand, and seek information, critically looking at sources of news and not succumbing to political apathy. Because of this it was particularly moving to listen to citizenship experts speaking at the recent House of Lords Committee on Citizenship and Civic Engagement and describing citizenship education as "withering on the vine".

At a time when all parties should agree that the changes being made locally, nationally and intra-nationally impact young people and that they should be given the tools and the forum to understand these, it is sad to hear of party politics getting in the way of what should be an entitlement that everyone has in a democratic system - that is to be given the knowledge to understand and the skills to contribute positively. To be able to make informed choices, whether in General Elections or community action.

Citizenship education in recent years has been in decline - both in status as an academic subject but also an area of expertise that teachers can specialise in. The result is shocking. The number of teachers specialising in citizenship this year is 40 compared to 230 in 2010. Liz Morse from the Association for Citizenship Teaching cites persistent government policy as a reason for this. She argues that citizenship teachers are a national asset but this subject area is not given the credit nor the status to encourage specialism. The result is that the delivery of high-quality citizenship education is few and far between to be found in schools. Only recently the National College for Teaching and Leadership introduced a programme for specialist leaders in education - citizenship was left out as a subject. It seems that policy decisions have meant that citizenship education is no longer viewed as a crucial part of the curriculum that should be delivered by specialists. It is not viewed as a subject which deserves status and investment and at worst teachers are being positively discouraged from pursuing it as an area to teach in. Ironically this all comes at a time when certain policy decisions make this subject all the more necessary to have in schools.

Tom Franklin from the education-based charity, the Citizenship Foundation, stated at the committee that 'the support for the subject has been dismantled. Though the subject is in the national curriculum, many schools do not teach it and so it is there in name only. Whether young people receive citizenship education therefore is a lottery'. Surely understanding how the democratic system works, how the legal system impacts our lives and how decisions are made locally are issues that all young people should be able to explore in school. It is an entitlement to living in a democratic society to understand the nature of that democracy and how it operates.

Interestingly, amongst young people there is an appetite for wanting to engage, wanting to understand and to debate issues. Unfortunately for thousands they are simply not given the opportunity to do so. The recent All Party Parliamentary Group on a Better Brexit for Young People (APPG-BBYP) found that though young people remained distrustful of political institutions, most remained passionate about politics' and believed that 'citizens do not have enough political knowledge' and that there needed to be investment in political education. Similarly in my experience teachers have been equally frustrated in not having the resources or the tools to deal sensitively with this area effectively. Charities like the Citizenship Foundation seek to bridge this gap by providing high quality lesson plans and resources for teachers to use, bringing these issues alive in the classroom and encouraging debate and discussion. But without the likes of the Department for Education and policy makers taking a lead in establishing citizenship as a core subject there cannot be a positive change in the culture around citizenship education.

The call to action is therefore multifaceted. Citizenship education, despite being in the national curriculum, needs to be invested in and this means providing career development prospects for teachers to specialise in the area and encouraging schools to take the subject seriously by allocating suitable time for it in the school day as well as fostering a culture of active inquisitive citizenship amongst its young people. Government policy needs to include citizenship education rather than excluding it and demonstrating at best disinterest for what is a vital subject area. Recent political developments have made it all the more crucial that the next generation is armed with the knowledge and skills to deal with a rapidly changing world, both to realise that they not only have a stake in society but that they can play a crucial part in shaping it.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post UK, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2xZPVYM
via IFTTT

How To Ask For A Pay Rise

According to the Chartered Management Institute, men are twice as likely as women to ask for a pay rise - and just as shocking is the fact that three in five women have never even asked. This is despite the fact that, as highlighted by the Channel Four Dispatches show 'Who Deserves A Pay Rise'? this week, it's been 15 years since most British workers saw any real-term pay increase.

So what's stopping you from asking? Now, I understand that some people find talking about money awkward. But you should not shy away from demanding fair pay for the work you do already and the skills you have.

Confidence is the key to your success. But you also need to negotiate from a position of strength. That means knowing what you want out of the bargaining - and what you are worth.

2017-10-20-1508502220-31020-didntgetthejob.jpg
Image: Pixabay

Be clear about your goals

Too many people approach chats about pay rises without enough research. It's particularly important to identify your target salary range and weigh-up your priorities. Check the salaries paid by competitors and use an online salary checker. You have every right to be ambitious - but be realistic: you'll never convince anyone to pay you a fantasy salary.

It's also important to think holistically about what you want. Don't just focus on the salary and benefits. Also think about the career opportunities and your work-life balance.

You need to gather all the important information about the job you do. Understanding the complexity of your role will give you a better view of your market value and being clear about how your in-demand skills will bring extra value to the company will put you in a much stronger negotiating position.

Make sure you know what is most important to you; what benefits you feel you must have and which ones you can live without.

2017-10-20-1508502304-6589116-jobinterview.jpg
Image: Pixabay

Convince them you're worth it

While it feels hard to do, it's usually best to meet your manager face-to-face to conduct salary negotiations rather than just send an email.

The most important thing is to be prepared and have realistic expectations. Arm yourself with the full knowledge of what you want, and what you'd be prepared to give up. That way you will be able to articulate your position confidently.

A classic negotiation technique is to start by asking for more than you are willing to accept. After all, you can always come down, but you can rarely go up. Above all, avoid confrontation and don't be defensive. Saying the salary's a joke or pleading your financial woes won't win you any favours. Instead, stay calm, respectful and focused.

If you've done your research, you'll have some bargaining chips. Highlight examples of where you have won clients, saved money or mentored a winning team. You could even prepare a portfolio, case studies or testimonials to demonstrate your claims. State your reasons clearly and then stop - let the other person fill the silence.

Try something along the lines of: "I think the added value I've brought to this role could be reflected in my pay. What do you think?" This is more likely to get a positive response than going in with all guns blazing and declaring "I won't take a penny less than £xxK!"

2017-10-20-1508502582-9959765-womanonlaptop.jpg
Image: Pixabay

Offer more

In order to be paid more, you might need to offer more. Can you prove you can add value beyond what's in the job description? If so, you may be able to persuade them to create a new position or direct you toward a higher-level role. It pays to have researched the typical salary and responsibilities for someone in a job that's one level above.

Know where you can be flexible to achieve a win-win outcome, by determining what is important to the company and to your own career. For example, if the company needs to control payroll expenses, would you be happy to work on a fixed term contract? If they really can't increase the salary, could you work fewer hours for the same pay? A savvy employer might realise the benefit of having your hard-to-find skills for 25 hours a week rather than a less experienced person for 37.

Another option is to agree a date (in writing) for a salary review. This should be after six months rather than a year. But remember, your negotiating power is usually strongest before you sign a revised contract.

All negotiations involve some compromise and you are unlikely to get everything you want. Knowing what is a "must have" versus a "nice to have" will help you make the right decisions. Don't push too hard - you don't want to push yourself out of a job - and be sure to ask your employer to confirm everything you've negotiated during your meetings in writing.

2017-10-20-1508502446-6408488-handshake.jpg
Image: Pixabay

Be assertive

Assertiveness is essential for successful negotiations. One of the best things you can do to boost your confidence is to role-play your salary negotiation with someone who's successfully asked for a pay rise before.

Even if it makes you feel uncomfortable, you must be prepared to market yourself to get the salary you deserve. Above all, never underestimate your value. Good luck in your negotiations - and go get that pay rise!

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post UK, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2zuOCCB
via IFTTT

43.2% Of Irish Children Aged 7-9 Yrs Old Are Suffering From Anxiety Issues

Research by a social network for primary school children in Ireland shows that more than 40% of kids aged seven to nine years old are showing increased levels of anxiety or stress.

The research carried out on 43,000 of its users by Cybersmarties - a safe educational social network for primary school kids, shows that the threat of a nuclear war, loss of a family member or money worries.

Cybersmarties.com, which is available to primary schools kids aged seven to 12 years old, carried out weekly research which shows that 43.2% of kids aged between seven and nine shows that anxiety is becoming more common at a younger age.

Although the system is designed to educate children in positive online behaviour, the instant messaging feature is revealing that children chat to each other about what is bothering them.

This in itself is a good thing but what is worrying sometimes is the content of those messages.
Children are like sponges, picking up a variety of information from many sources and because of their age are not always able to assimilate it in a logical way but rather purely on a personal or an emotional level.

Recent tensions between the US and North Korea and the potential threat of a nuclear war is often spoken about between children. Kids are obviously picking this up at home, overhearing conversations etc or the news itself and therefore think what that news means to them personally.

Kids can pick up on the news from family members or on television. If a parent or older sibling is expressing concern over a particular news item then children pick up on that and feel they must also be worried.

Loss of a loved one, like a grandparent can also be very traumatic to a child and is spoken about to a friend on an emotional level like feeling sad or lonely.

Financial issues which may be a concern at home is another anxiety trigger.

We are coming across is "live" data which has never been accessible before. Generally speaking girls are more likely to talk to their friends online about emotional issues more so than boys but at the same time are more likely to break friendships faster so overtime boys will reveal more but in a different fashion.

This is the way kids communicate now so it is important that our learning tools reflect this especially when it comes to social issues.

The more positive information we feed to kids, the more positive the kids themselves are and also the less likely they are to show inappropriate behaviour. Introducing "What If I Feel" videos using cartoon characters to explain certain emotions, that it is normal and commonplace to feel anxious along with the coping tools to react to such a feeling is having a very positive impact on the ground.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post UK, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2xZNCVP
via IFTTT

The 20 Stages Of A Hangover As Told By 'Stranger Things'

’Stranger Things’ is a glorious show, and we couldn’t be more excited about season two landing on Netflix this Friday (27 October). One thing the show is not, however, is good hangover viewing.


That’s got nothing to do with its gruesomeness, but more the fact that it mimics the fragile situations we often find ourselves in of a weekend.  


Here’s the stages of a hangover, as told by the show. 


1. When you wake up not even knowing your own name





2. When you realise you’ve already slept through the brunch date you arranged with your parents





3. When you have to do the walk of shame





4. When the fear then begins to creep in 





5. Then come the flashbacks





6. When you decide to call for reassurance





7. When your mates start filling in the blanks





8. But they just don’t understand the dark, dark place you are in at that moment





9. When you then actually feel worse for having called them 





10. When you begin the hunt for your missing dignity





11. When you can no longer ignore the alcohol fumes that are seeping out of every pore





12. When you take a 30-minute shower hoping the water will wash away all the shame





13. When you text that person from Tinder to apologise for the onslaught of drunken messages you left them the night before





14. When you ask your housemates to just hold you gently and quietly 





15. When you raid the house for anything and everything to make you feel more human





16. When the Dominos delivery man arrives with your family meal deal you intend on eating just for one





17. When you then regret eating a large pizza, two sides and a drinking whole bottle of Fanta





18. When someone suggests a hair of the dog





19. But then you come round to their way of thinking





20. And before you know it, you’re out again





‘Stranger Things 2’ arrives on Netflix on Friday 27 October. 


type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=READ MORE: + articlesList=599c40e8e4b06a788a2bdca0,589867f6e4b0505b1f592fdc,57c80b29e4b09f5b5e354b0e




-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post UK, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2zwtZWx
via IFTTT

Language And Actions Define Our Tiny Humans

2017-10-23-1508732802-4429324-ScreenShot20171023at2.25.57PM.png


I firmly believe that the language we use when speaking to our children is one of the key factors in defining them in life. It moulds how they interpret the world, what they prioritise, their communication with others and most importantly - themselves.

I personally think that SOME humans can be too flippant with their choice of words, brush off their mannerisms around their children and not understand that words they choose can have such a strong impact on their little ones. I'm not talking about the obvious things like yelling at them, criticising them or making fun of them...obviously none of that is going to create a positive environment for them to flourish.

What I'm talking about is the subtle tones or the words that we could be changing in day to day life, to help build strong little humans.

For example with my daughter - instead of focussing on words like "beautiful", "pretty" (all of which she absolutely is)...I want to try to focus on things like "caring", "healthy", "smart", "unique".

I'm not saying that i don't tell her she is beautiful... I do every single day - but it goes hand in hand with "you are so beautiful, you are so kind, you are so strong".

The sole reason I do this is because I want her to grow up celebrating all of the things that make her different instead of worrying about all of the moulds she thinks she needs to fit into.
The plan is that if it's engrained into her brain early enough and I remain consistent, that she won't even stress about these said moulds.

Of course that goes hand in hand with being her example of that. I need to set a standard for myself too because she is always watching. If she sees me as a strong, confident, caring woman...that will be her "normal".

Obviously at some point she will have her first dose of social expectations - if we are being honest, it could happen as early as first grade.

However if she has been raised to celebrate diversity, we have reinforced that she is understanding/patient/kind/positive - then hopefully she has a stronger tolerance to peer pressure or negativity when this little speed bump arises.

Obviously I can't see the future - but what I can focus on is right now!

I can focus on celebrating her every single day.
I can lead by example to show tolerance/understanding and compassion to all humans.
I can be responsible for the way she treats others.
I can take ownership of the way I speak to her, how I handle situations, whether I get frustrated over simple things or show her to focus your energy on what is really important.
I can get angry or I can show patience.
I can be blame her for my tiredness or I can thank her for being the tiny arms around my neck at night that I've spent my whole life waiting for.

As parents we need to take ownership of the way we speak to them, the way we teach them and the way in which we lead by example. There is no point in telling her these things if I don't follow through and do it of myself because then all I'm teaching her is that I'm a hypocrite!

They are little sponges absorbing every word, feeling and lesson from the moment they land earth side. Maybe even before that...we used to sing to her when she was in my belly and now she covers her ears every time I sing, so maybe she wasn't too fussed on it!

2017-10-23-1508732916-7885594-ScreenShot20171023at2.28.03PM.png

The point is - it's easy to be tired/frustrated/upset - some days parenting is intense!

It's also easy to brush off our actions while they are too little to walk or talk and say things like "Oh they don't understand yet, ill stop when she knows whats going on"...but they are still absorbing.

When we signed up to be parents - we chose this life!

We chose to be the person in their corner teaching them the difference between right and wrong...we are responsible for making them feel every bit "enough" for this life.

We are the people that show them to self love from day one so they never rely on the approval of others.

As parents - if we stop worrying about the long term and instead pour love and happy ju ju into every moment as it presents itself ...then I'm sure the overall picture and long term outcome will be just that.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post UK, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.



from The Huffington Post | The Full Feed http://ift.tt/2hYtmxH
via IFTTT

CPA Cash Machine